What a number can tell you
Traits describe self-reported tendencies. Puzzle results describe performance in the completed session. Political axes describe preferences on the issues asked. These units are not interchangeable: we do not create an overall score for intelligence, personal worth or mental health.
No Intelligence assessment currently uses representative population norms. A score out of 100 is not a percentile. Interpretive thresholds are explanatory guides, not diagnostic boundaries.
Research-backed questionnaire · IPIP Big-Five factor markers
Big Five Personality
Describe how you generally are, rather than who you think you should be. These 50 statements come from the published IPIP Big-Five factor markers: ten statements per trait. You can revisit every response before revealing your result.
- Assessment
- big-five · v1
- Question count
- 50
- Question bank
- 2026-10-24.1
- Scoring
- v1
- Content version
- 2026-10-24.1
- Audience
- 16+
Scoring and completion criteria
Responses use a five-point accuracy scale. Positively keyed items contribute their response value (1–5); negatively keyed items contribute 6 minus that value. Each ten-item sum (10–50) is transformed to 0–100 using (sum − 10) ÷ 40 × 100. The original scoring direction is preserved. These are scale scores, not population percentiles.
All 50 items must be answered. All ten items per factor contribute to the original scoring key; no additional subfacets are inferred.
Interpretation and confidence
Self-reports depend on your current perspective, context and interpretation. This inventory does not measure clinical conditions, intelligence or detailed subfacets. No Wabiro population norms are available. The French translation is authored for Wabiro and has not been independently validated; equivalence to the English instrument is not established.
Languages and translation
The complete experience is available in English and French. Wabiro’s French translation has not undergone independent psychometric validation. Scoring is locale-independent; that does not demonstrate psychometric equivalence. Other locales are not advertised as available.
Sources and permissions
IPIP items and scales are in the public domain, including commercial use. We use the published Big-Five factor-marker key and preserve the construct names and scoring direction.
- IPIP: Big-Five factor markers and scoring key
- IPIP: scoring instructions
- IPIP: public-domain permission
Privacy
Your answers are scored on your device. You can keep your result locally; account sync of an eligible summary is optional. No individual answer is sent to analytics.
ExploreEducational cognitive challenge · original Wabiro puzzles
Cognitive Reasoning Challenge
Look for a pattern, test a deduction or work through a numerical sequence. Each session selects 18 questions from an original 36-question bank, with three questions in each of six categories. Choose an untimed session or an optional timed challenge before you start.
- Assessment
- logical-reasoning · v1
- Question count
- 18 from 36 original puzzles
- Question bank
- 2026-10-24.1
- Scoring
- v1
- Content version
- 2026-10-24.1
- Audience
- 16+
Scoring and completion criteria
Each correct answer earns one point. Attempted-question accuracy is correct answers divided by attempted questions; the completed session also shows the number correct out of 18. Category scores describe only the questions selected for that session. Editorial difficulty labels are not empirically calibrated.
You may skip a puzzle. The result separates correct answers, attempted questions and the session total. A category with only a few examples cannot establish a general ability.
Interpretation and confidence
This challenge is not a standardized IQ examination, a diagnosis or an admission test for Mensa. No representative population norms or intelligence rankings are claimed. Practice, language, familiarity and chosen timing can affect performance. Retakes with different questions are not directly equivalent.
Languages and translation
The complete experience is available in English and French. Wabiro’s French translation has not undergone independent psychometric validation. Scoring is locale-independent; that does not demonstrate psychometric equivalence. Other locales are not advertised as available.
Sources and permissions
Questions in this experience were authored for Wabiro. They are not presented as a standardized or validated inventory; a cited organisation does not imply endorsement.
Privacy
Puzzles and scoring run on your device. Local history and optional eligible profile summaries never turn your individual answers into analytics events.
ExploreOriginal self-reflection exercise · not a validated political inventory
Political Affinity Explorer
Reflect on economic policy, civil liberties, social change and environmental priorities. Each axis stands on its own. The questions are original and educational; they do not claim to represent every political tradition or tell you how to vote. This opt-in experience is for adults aged 18 and over.
- Assessment
- political-affinity · v1
- Question count
- 32
- Question bank
- 2026-10-24.1
- Scoring
- v1
- Content version
- 2026-10-24.1
- Audience
- 18+
Scoring and completion criteria
Each axis has eight items with balanced scoring directions. Substantive responses from disagreement to agreement contribute −2 to +2 after reversing the relevant items. Their mean is multiplied by 50 to produce a −100 to +100 axis position. Neutral contributes zero; uncertain and skipped answers are excluded. Fewer than four substantive answers on an axis means no axis score is shown.
You may provide no substantive responses. The result then shows insufficiently answered axes instead of inventing a position. Neutral is a response; uncertain and skipped items do not enter the mean.
Interpretation and confidence
These four axes are a limited, original model. Scores are neither political facts nor measures of knowledge, intelligence or moral worth. Terminology and policy priorities vary by country. The questionnaire has no validated norms and does not establish party affiliation.
Languages and translation
The complete experience is available in English and French. Wabiro’s French translation has not undergone independent psychometric validation. Scoring is locale-independent; that does not demonstrate psychometric equivalence. Other locales are not advertised as available.
Sources and permissions
Questions in this experience were authored for Wabiro. They are not presented as a standardized or validated inventory; a cited organisation does not imply endorsement.
- European Commission: information for individuals and special categories
- Swiss Federal Act on Data Protection, Article 5
Privacy
Your answers and derived political scores stay only in this page’s memory. They are not saved in browser storage or sent to Wabiro’s servers, Wabiro ID, Wabiro+, analytics, payment or marketing systems. There is no sharing or paid report. Reloading or leaving the experience clears this session.
ExploreVersions and editorial review
Results carry the assessment ID and the bank, scoring and content versions. A change that could alter a score requires a new version. Retake comparisons must account for versions, question selection and timing differences.
Our editorial checklist requires verified sources and permissions, a tested scoring key, balanced wording, explicit limits, complete translations and a privacy check before publication. Diagnoses, norms, endorsements and comparison figures are never invented. New assessments are published only with complete questions, scoring and results.
Updated: 2026-10-24